Huffpost Voces.

Bjorn Lomborg y el ranking de los principales retos de la humanidad, ¿preocupaciones equivocadas? Publicado: 09/06/2012

El desempleo, la crisis de la vivienda y la baja calidad de la educación pueden ser los grandes desafíos que enfrentamos en Estados Unidos y otras naciones desarrolladas, pero no son los grandes problemas del mundo actual. ¿Y el calentamiento global?. Es un problema, pero tampoco es el más importante que enfrenta el mundo moderno. 

Project Syndicate2012-06-13 Bjorn Lomborg Project Syndicate

Tens of thousands of people will soon gather in Rio de Janeiro for the United Nations Earth Summit. The participants, ranging from weary politicians to enthusiastic campaigners, are supposed to reignite global concern for the environment. Unfortunately, the summit is likely to be a wasted opportunity. 

Posted by Bjørn Lomborg. Monday 4 June 2012 09.00 BST

Newsweek  Bjorn Lomborg 2012-05-28

A message from Bjørn Lomborg to organizers of the Rio+20 environmental summit: poverty pollutes.

The Indian Times India Times, 14 May, 2012.

2012-05-23 Si tuviera 75.000 millones de dólares para gastar en los próximos cuatro años y su objetivo fuera mejorar el bienestar de la humanidad, en especial, el mundo en desarrollo, ¿cómo le sacaría el máximo provecho a ese dinero?  Esa pregunta la hice ante un pánel compuesto por cinco de los mejores economistas, incluidos cuatro galardonados con el Premio Nobel, durante el proyecto del Consenso de Copenhague del 2012.

2012-05-23 75 Milliarden Dollar reichen, um große Menschheitsprobleme wie Unterernährung und Malaria bei Kindern zu beheben. Wenn alles so einfach ist, warum tun wir es nicht? 

May 16, 2012By Bjorn Lomborg 

Project Syndicate

COPENHAGEN – If you had $75 billion to spend over the next four years and your goal was to advance human welfare, especially in the developing world, how could you get the most value for your money? That is the question that I posed to a panel of five top economists, including four Nobel laureates, in the Copenhagen Consensus 2012 project. The panel members were chosen for their expertise in prioritization and their ability to use economic principles to compare policy choices. 

  2012-05-20 Ако имате 75 милијарди долари да ги потрошите во текот на следните четири години, и вашата цел е да се унапредат благосостојбата на луѓето, особено во земјите во развој, како може најдобро да ги искористите своите пари? Тоа е прашањето што го поставив пред група од пет водечки економисти, вклучувајќи и четири добитници на Нобелова награда, на проектот Копенхаген Консензус 2012. Учесниците на панел-дискусијата беа избрани поради нивната стручност во утврдување на приоритетите и нивната способност да ги користат економските принципи за да се споредат политичките избори.

How Better Nutrition for Children Helps Solve Two of the World’s Biggest Problems

A group of Nobel laureates analyze the cost-effectiveness of solutions to the world's biggest problems By Bjørn Lomborg Posted Monday, May 14, 2012, at 1:53 PM ET

Over the past two weeks, I have challenged Slate readers to decide what priority to give competing ways to help the planet. We looked at 10 topics, from biodiversity to water and sanitation. In total, there were nearly 40 investment proposals, each with a cost and its own set of benefits.